Good fences?
By David Benjamin
“Something there is that doesn't love a wall…”
— Robert Frost
MADISON,
Wis. — The only fence I ever loved was here in Madison, erected around
an immense construction site for what became the Elvehjem Art Center.
Known modestly as the University Avenue fence, it became a magnet for
art students, frustrated poets, revolutionaries and disgruntled English
majors. One undergrad spent several gallons of paint to compose a list
of at least 100 pet peeves, starting — brilliantly, I thought — with The
Castle of Otranto by Horace Walpole.
My favorite fence artist
was the anonymous illustrator who painted an enormous image of the
Buddhist deity, spectacularly fat and nude but for a loincloth, his face
conveying an attitude of pleasurable mischief. The demigod’s blubbery
hams and epic thighs sprawled horizontally across twenty feet of
fenceboard. Squished beneath this Hotei (his Japanese name) were
countless tiny people, flattened, subsumed, suffocating and struggling
pathetically to escape. The artist had titled this subtle masterpiece,
“Buddha Will Crush You.” To this day, I scold myself for not taking a
photo of the great Elvehjem Buddha.
The University Avenue fence
appeared when I was in high school, before the word “graffiti” became
part of the vernacular. But the fence was a mecca for graffiti. Four
city blocks around, it cried out with caricatures and comic strips,
messages, love sonnets, hateful haikus, feuilletons and fearful words. I
went downtown every week to see what had been painted over and to
discover what fresh outrages the restive student body of the University
of Wisconsin had splashed and scrawled. Of course, nobody ever
encroached on Hotei’s space. He was sacred.
The guy who got me
thinking about fences lately was Donald Trump, when he vowed to build a
Mexican border wall — “the biggest, the strongest, not penetrable, they
won’t be crawling over it.” If I dared to hope that eager throngs of
ironic muralists would flock to the border to cover Trump’s foolish
fence — over and over — with wit and inspiration, I’d be tempted to
contribute to the project.
But if it ever got built, Trump’s
wall would repel only the human imagination. Timid tyrants since Hadrian
have been putting up fences that looked formidable but turned out easy
to either circumvent or clamber over. Besides, usually there were
“friends” already inside the fence more sinister than the enemy beyond.
While the Ming emperor lined the Great Wall with soldiers to stall the
Manchu barbarians, Li Zicheng’s rebel conspiracy in Peking was bringing
down the dynasty.
The Bastille, whose walls symbolized French
tyranny more palpably than any other edifice, was demolished by hand.
Afterward, it literally disappeared.
The Berlin Wall’s main
accomplishment was to epitomize the terror and misery of the people
stuck behind it. When he urged Soviet premier Gorbachev to “tear down
this wall,” President Ronald Reagan intimated a possible end to the love
affair between our own tribal patriots and their fences.
It was
but a respite. After the Gipper retired, his disciples went right back
to the hardware store for more barbed wire. Fence-lovers have erected a
ludicrous patchwork of barricades along the Rio Grande. If he could work
his will, President Trump would expand this mess into “a wall like
nobody can build a wall…”
Meanwhile, Hungary’s reaction to
refugees from all the strife-torn countries eastward and southward is a
wall against Serbia. Tunisia wants a fence to foil terrorists from
Libya. Israel is two-thirds finished with a breastworks of concrete,
steel, concertina wire and a 60-meter “exclusion area” (in Berlin, this
was called “the death strip”) to encircle the Palestinians of the West Bank.
Predictably, that project has bogged down. The explanations
are numerous, but the unspoken intuition is that the bigger the wall,
the less it can contain.
The vast canvas along University Avenue
was a “good fence,” because it didn’t really keep anything in, or
anybody out. The crumbling stone wall in Robert Frost’s poem —
separating the neighbor’s pines from Frost’s apple trees — was equally
useless and, hence, as good a fence as a fence can be. That thing on the
West Bank, on the other hand, is a piss-poor fence indeed.
Right-wing
Israelis and pent-up Palestinians are not the sort of neighbors who’ll
walk the fenceline on a day in spring, studying how thaws and winds,
scuttling squirrels and climbing kids have displaced stones and widened
breaches. Nor are Hungarians and Serbs likely to peer across their
border through a damaged stretch of razor wire and playfully suggest
that the mischief was done by elves.
Frost was coy when he
suggested no culprit in the gradual dismantling of our man-piled
barriers. He knew who that “something” is that doesn’t love a wall.
Those who build fences do so despite knowing that no fence is perfect,
nor will it ever be — especially if it’s meant to isolate one half of
humankind from another half. A really big fence — like Trump’s
hypothetical colossus out by Laredo — is therapy for the fearful, the
small-minded, the ignorant. Something there is in a wall that thrills
the reactionary mind.
There is a healthy human instinct to look
at a serious fence the way we look at crosswords and murder mysteries.
The fence is a conundrum that tests our wits, summons our ingenuity and
demands ¬— no matter how difficult — a solution. It’s a black line drawn
by hand that arbitrarily divides an empty expanse in two, making
another hand itch for an eraser.
Most of us, all our lives, have
never built a fence or raised a wall. But we’ve peeked through, climbed
over, circled around, pushed down, crawled under and — best of all —
painted, on more fences than we could ever count.
Friday, July 31, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Yes, Benj, I remember the University Ave. Fence. Circled the entire area that became Humanities and, later, the Elvehjem (now Chazen). A good fence, indeed.
Post a Comment