On the Internet, nobody
knows you’re a Commie
by David Benjamin
“I believe Putin will continue to re-build the Russian Empire. He has zero respect for Obama or the U.S.!”
— Donald Trump, 21 March 2014
PARIS — The Republicans have become a party of Commie dupes and Russian apparatchiks.
In
response to this charge, you might argue that the Russians, currently
holding hands and whispering sweet nothings into Donald Trump’s ear, are
no longer the “Communists” of the Soviet era (even though Russian
president-for-life Vladimir Putin is one of the proudest, truest scions
of that regime). However, there are historians who would patiently
explain that the Soviet era was never really Communist in Karl Marx’s
sense of the concept, but a rough continuation of the tsarist oligarchy that ruled the Russian empire for the previous millenium.
If
you see Russia as a state run by an absolutist despot sustained by a
handpicked clique of obscenely wealthy aristocrats, while the vast
majority of the people struggle for survival and soothe their pain with
vodka, you see a continuum that bridges both the Revolution of 1917 and
the Soviet breakup in 1991. Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, Gorbachev,
Yeltsin and Putin are Romanovs by other names and the upheavals that put
them in power were not so much “revolutions” as a couple of major bowel
movements (that flushed millions of innocent Russians).
During
America’s Cold War with the USSR, the crusade against Commie
infiltration by the Russians was a fullblown hysteria, led by the
Republican Party. I grew up under the dark cloud of paranoia
disseminated by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), the
John Birch Society and the slander campaign of Senator Joseph McCarthy. I
watched Ronald Reagan rage against pinko liberals on General Electric
Theater on Sunday night on CBS.
American kids all lived with
certainty of death before adulthood in a nuclear exchange with the
Soviet monster. While the White House and Pentagon were girding our
national loins for atomic Armageddon and waging a bloody cycle of
anti-Communist proxy wars in Asia, U.S. and Soviet intelligence were
battling each other covertly with spies, propaganda, infiltration and
misinformation.
If you’re not a Republican, you can see the irony here.
According
to the U.S. spy services — CIA, FBI, DIS, NSA — who used to be the
apple of every conservative’s eye, the Russians are interfering in
American government more directly and far more effectively than they
ever accomplished in the Soviet past. Nevertheless, all this espionage —
engineered by a self-made tsar who cut his teeth as a fingernail-yanker
in the Soviet KGB — has been pooh-poohed by pinko conservatives as a
Democratic Party fantasy.
In a presentation last week on the Queen Mary 2, Scott Shane, chief national security reporter for the New York Times, called Russia’s cyber-campaign against America’s fundamental institutions “incredibly brazen, incredibly successful.”
“This,”
he said, “is an attack that involved no Russian tanks, no Russian
missiles, no Russian bullets.” Operating on the principle that “On the
Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog,” Russians cybernauts wormed
invisibly into U.S. organizations, federal agencies and political
campaigns. This offensive was far more damaging than all that old-school
military hardware. “They can pose as Americans. They can pose as news
websites,” said Shane. “It’s infinitely more effective” than traditional
propaganda.
Vladimir Putin launched this cyberwar capability
years ago. He first used it to discredit political foes in Russia, then
turned it against Eastern European democracies. Putin had foreseen the
power of cyberspace information control even as his dread spy factory,
the KGB, was being sidelined by Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin in
the chaotic ‘90s. Said Shane, “I never believed in 1991 that Putin would
be able to regain information control the way he has.”
Putin has assembled a misinformation and propaganda — in Russian, kompromat
— regime cheaper than Russia’s military budget, which is only about $65
billion a year (the Pentagon spends ten times as much). But it has
defeated the United States more decisively than any Cold War conflict.
Without money, without armies, “the Russians can do quite well in this
cyber realm,” said Shane.
He cited the email leaks that targeted
the Democratic National Committee and ended, suddenly, the chairmanship
of Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. “When you look at this from the
Russian point of view, this was a stupendous success,” said Shane. “The
Trump campaign was overjoyed as well.”
Why target Hillary Clinton
so aggressively? Shane said Clinton’s policies as Secretary of State
were privately offensive to Putin, who — like Trump — is a
pathologically personal person, especially when he perceives a slight
from a woman.
“Putin blamed Hillary Clinton personally,” said Shane, “for trying to undermine him, as the embodiment of an arrogant America.”
Herein
lies the answer to why the Republicans worms have turned so squishily
against their Commie-hating heritage. Their quarter-century jihad
against Hillary Clinton, the uppity bitch from Little Rock, predates
their knowing Vlad Putin from a hole in the wall. Putin is the enemy of
their worst enemy since Ethel Rosenberg. Even now, with Hillary beaten
and tearfully wandering the woods in Chappaqua, Trump and his GOP
minions in Congress launch weekly attacks on Hillary, conjuring
imaginary crimes for imaginary prosecutors to prosecute in the Emerald
City of imaginary Oz.
In abandoning their vendetta versus Russia,
the Republicans have dismissed Putin’s cyberwar as a petty political
ploy, propagated by Democrats and by “fake news” outlets like Shane’s New York Times.
Having blamed Dems and the press for exaggerating Putin’s impact on the
U.S. election, Republicans dare not touch this issue. They’ve so
thoroughly demonized Democrats and the media— since the McCarthy era— as
dupes and “fellow travelers" with the Soviet subversion machine, that
they cannot now make common cause with these fellow Americans against
Putin’s much more effective campaign of subversion.
Besides, as Donald Trump has delusionally tweeted, “Putin likes me.”
Not
surprisingly Shane’s take on Putin is more nuanced. Vladimir Putin
targeted the Democratic campaign partly out of hatred for Hillary. But,
even better, he saw Trump as a potential U.S. president uniquely
susceptible to greed, flattery, lust and — as a last resort — blackmail
(a beloved KGB device). Putin recognized Trump, said Shane, as a U.S.
version of Silvio Berlusconi, the flamboyantly corrupt ex-prime minister
of Italy, whom Putin also curried, cultivated, co-opted and fleeced.
“He saw Donald Trump, similarly, as a blustery Western businessman who’s
not all that hung up about human rights and that sort of thing.”
Putin’s winning streak, which included Trump’s sniveling performance at the G20 conference, is hardly over, said Shane.
Shane cited ongoing investigations by the Times
based on a Trump dossier assembled by former British secret agent
Christopher Steele. The contents remain largely uncorroborated (although
some details have been proven true). Neither the Times nor any other
responsible news organization has risked any assertion on the veracity
of Steele’s largely unsourced claims.
Shane admitted his own
frustration at trying to track down these stories to either verify or
kill them. But while working the puzzle, Shane has clarified that the
Russians “had their eye on Trump to get leverage over him.” The details
of the Steele dossier are evidence of that objective — even if they’re
not true.
Among Steele’s notes, said Shane, is an alleged meeting
in Prague between Michael Cohen, a Trump confidant, and a Putin
surrogate named Alexander Solodukhin. Whether the meeting happened, said
Shane, is thus far “completely unprovable,” even though to a veteran
national security reporter, it “looks like Cold War ‘Spy vs. Spy’ stuff
on steroids.”
But the genius of Putin’s kompromat game,
said Shane, is that no charge or rumor requires proof as long as
America’s media pounce and spread it virally around the globe while the
truth is pulling on its socks. Referring to the possible
Cohen-Solodukhin meeting in Prague, Shane said, “Let’s consider that
this meeting was fabricated. If it was fabricated… it was fabricated by
Russian intelligence.”
Fake or not, the mere report that the
meeting might have occurred implicates the Trump presidential campaign
with the highest levels of Russian power. The inescapable conclusion,
noted Shane, with a measure of embarrassment over the rank gullibility
of the 21st-century U.S. media, is that, “the Russian government, having
run an incredibly successful misinformation campaign against Hillary
Clinton, has also planted some time bombs against Donald Trump.”
Even
without proof that Cohen contacted Solodukhin, other Russian meetings —
some unproven, some revealed by various idiots in the Trump camp, like
Donald Trump, Jr. — have dominated the news for months.
The
result is “a brilliant information operation against Donald Trump that
has cast a shadow over the first months of the Trump administration.”
Said Shane, “It has set US intelligence agencies onto a trail that leads
nowhere… [It has] discredited American democracy and made Western
democracy less credible to Eastern Europe as a threat to [Putin’]s
regime and the style it represents.”
Shane readily faults the
American press. Its susceptibility to celebrity and bullshit greased the
skids for Trump’s ascent. Now it’s enabling a murderous Russian
autocrat to subjugate this American presidency to his largely unknown
but dangerous purposes. “We are very easily manipulated,” he said. “If
somebody leaks something, do we just go and run with it?”
“It
worries me,” Shane added, “that by sort of jumping on anything that we
think is authentic but was leaked by an intelligence agency, we are
putting ourselves at the mercy of hackers or [foreign] intelligence
agencies” whose sole mission is spreading sophisticated lies.
Putin,
without leaving even a fingerprint behind, is turning all news into
fake news and “Believe me!” into America’s national punchline.
Thursday, July 20, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment