With apologies to H.G. Wells
By David Benjamin
MADISON, Wis. — H.G. Wells,
wherever he is, must be wondering where he went wrong. Although one of
history’s great futurists, I doubt that he foresaw, when he wrote The War of the Worlds, that he had limned the most popular — and eventually the most tiresome and hackneyed — movie theme of the 21st century.
For more than 60 years, moviegoers have been watching their favorite
cities being reduced to rubble by giant robotic invaders, usually
manipulated by invisible alien misanthropes whose heart’s desire is to
slaughter every living thing on earth, devour its every resource and
leave behind a dead planet as nude as a cueball.
It all started in 1898, when Wells’ book came out. Repercussions remained minor for 40 years, until Orson Welles’ Mercury Theater on the Air broadcast a radio version of The War of the Worlds so vivid that people ran panic-stricken into the streets convinced that America was being overwhelmed by Martians.
Since then, invaders, monsters, machines and giant cyborgs have
trampled, trashed, and cinematically incinerated every major city in the
world dozens of times. Byron Haskin directed the first version of The War of the Worlds
in 1953 and won a technical Oscar. That launched a special-effects war
among filmmakers that has yet to end. The latest incursion is an
ocean-born alien-invader flick called Pacific Rim. Predictably, it drowned on its first weekend in release.
In 1898, monsters from outer space was a cool premise, and Wells was
gifted enough to lend it the sort of depth that has kept the theme
alive ever since. Among my favorite variations were Godzilla’s repeated attacks on Tokyo, a series of zombie-infested urban wastelands that began with Vincent Price in The Last Man on Earth and the sheer final-scene genius of Planet of the Apes.
By the late 60’s, however, Toho’s Godzilla suit was fraying at the
cuffs and the shtick was wearing thin. Until… computer graphics. Roland
Emmerich, in the “spectacular — and spectacularly stupid” (Leonard
Maltin) film, Independence Day
in 1996, gave the flying-saucer city-squishing genre a fresh franchise
by simultaneously barbecuing New York, L.A., Washington and Paris in the
most picturesque wave of wanton demolition (and human carnage) ever put
on film.
Since then, New York and L.A. have been flattened again and again, by monsters, by alien robots (Spielberg’s 2005 War of the Worlds
was both escalation and enervation), even by volcano, tsunami and the
onset of a flash-freeze Ice Age. But it all traces back to the little
book that earned H.G. Wells a 200-pound payday.
Wells would be perplexed, I think, by what he hath wrought. He
certainly would have foreseen that you can only flatten Manhattan so
many times before the thrill is gone, especially since you can walk out
of the theater and look around and there it is — New York City —
unscathed, unwashed and brazenly unashamed.
Wells would be puzzled by our fascination with the endlessly
repeated leveling of our greatest architecture. He might see something
jaded about people who can take pleasure in such vandalism. We might
tell him it’s not so bad, ‘cause everybody knows it’s fake. But that, in
itself, is a pretty jaded response.
And herein lies, possibly, Hollywood’s dilemma. The more jaded we
become, the more horrific Hollywood’s movies have to be. By scaling up
our robots, aliens, monsters, mother ships and death stars, Hollywood
has scaled up cynicism to levels previously unknown to the human
experience. To a substantial extent, the human experience has been
squeezed out of our most fantastic and fanciful entertainments.
High-tech eye-candy like Pacific Rim or Transformers
is not what H.G. Wells intended. His fellow futurists, whose work came
to be known as “science fiction,” also had deeper themes in mind. In 2001,
for example, Stanley Kubrick’s HAL 9000 computer failed because HAL
absorbed too many — not too few — human feelings, including the fear of
death. Philip K. Dick’s sci-fi classic, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep — filmed as Blade Runner — is populated by robots who must be killed because they’ve developed egos and discovered romance.
Perhaps the most terrifying sci-fi flick of all was Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
It features no robots, no death rays, no torched cities. The alien
invaders are an invisible cloud of pollen that drifts through the air we
breathe and turns human beings into a goggle-eyed species of ambulatory
vegetables.
Even Wells, after the pyrotechnics of his Martian invasion, provides
a simple human solution to his war between worlds. Earthlings are
vastly outgunned. Earth weapons are useless against the alien tripods,
and mankind appears doomed — until the Martians catch a cold. They’re
done in by microbes and viruses to which earthlings are congenitally
resistant. The variety and resilience of humanity’s very humanity trumps
the immense firepower and superior technology of an invader who didn’t
have the sense to get a tetanus shot before he set foot on the Earth.
A weekend before Pacific Rim (price tag, $180 million) was released, I watched Random Harvest, one of those small-budget, human-scale movies Hollywood seems reluctant to risk nowadays. At a glance, Random Harvest offers no more surprises than your average alien-blitzkrieg flick. But look closely.
In Random Harvest, a contrived plot meanders gently toward an
ending that’s obvious an hour in advance — as soon as Smithy bumps his
head and remembers that he’s Charles Rainier. In Random Harvest,
like any movie, the set is fake, the characters are fictional, the story
is a little far-fetched. But I still I get emotional every time Greer
Garson and Ronald Coleman fall into that final embrace, because there
are bits and flashes of my own life in that moment. Something of what
Paula and Smithy feel is something all of us have felt — or should have
felt.
By contrast, it’s hard to muster any sort of analog feeling while
watching the fake destruction of a computer-simulated L.A. by
animatronic alien juggernauts for the umpteenth time — except perhaps
the urge to apologize to H.G. Wells.
Thursday, July 18, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Brilliant essay on a topic that needed clarification. My favorites go back to the Day of the Triffieds and the Day the Earth Stood Still.
Honest: I get a lump in my throat every single time I hear Ripley spit "get away from her, you bitch."
As a species, we are now advanced enough to wipe ourselves out. Nukes and global warming are real enough threats already. And then there's the potential for the release of some plague virus, or nanobots getting out of control, or for hostile aliens to following one of the Voyager back to where it came from.
There are certainly ways to represent those fears in sci-fi movies that could, potentially, connect on a human level, but Bay and Emmerich aren't the guys to do it. I'm not sure I'd recommend "Seeking a Friend For the End of the World," but it was certainly a welcome move in the human direction.
Post a Comment